IMO, you shouldn’t have to learn Arch just to be able to get a new PC. Eventually, people who like Ubuntu and Mint are going to want to upgrade to a new computer, and they might be in for a shock once they do. That kind of thing is what pushes people back to Windows.
- 0 Posts
- 9 Comments
My experience has been the opposite. I built a new PC last year, and only Fedora and Arch recognized the Radeon GPU and the Intel Wi-Fi. Mint was shipping a kernel that was too old to recognize either one.
danielton1@lemmy.worldto
linuxmemes@lemmy.world•spend hours ricing my desktop and decided I hated it at the end, and ended up wiping my entire OS
3·2 months agoThe issue is that the GNOME devs have made it VERY clear that they don’t want you doing this.
danielton1@lemmy.worldto
linuxmemes@lemmy.world•spend hours ricing my desktop and decided I hated it at the end, and ended up wiping my entire OS
2·2 months agoUbuntu originally came out because Debian Sarge took much longer than usual to get released, and everything in Debian Woody was woefully out of date in 2004. KDE 3 and GNOME 2 had been out for a while but the latest Debian was shipping KDE 2.2.2 and GNOME 1.4. Ubuntu’s philosophy was to provide a more up-to-date distro for regular people.
I’ve been using Linux long enough that I used Debian Woody.
danielton1@lemmy.worldto
linuxmemes@lemmy.world•spend hours ricing my desktop and decided I hated it at the end, and ended up wiping my entire OS
2·2 months agoYeah, and the GNOME team sees people using extensions, breaks them, and says “No, you WILL use it OUR way or else!”
Whenever I’ve tried GNOME, I’d say about 75% of the extensions I’ve seen recommended as recently as a year prior were now broken on the latest release. And apparently GNOME really hates the idea of a systray/AppIndicator even though most distros and users want it, other desktops have it, and Mac and Windows have it
danielton1@lemmy.worldto
linuxmemes@lemmy.world•spend hours ricing my desktop and decided I hated it at the end, and ended up wiping my entire OS
6·2 months agoBefore Ubuntu existed, most distros aimed at newcomers shipped with KDE as the default. I’m not sure why Ubuntu went with GNOME as the default, but since Ubuntu came out, everything shifted to GNOME.
GNOME is definitely not going for a single UI that will please everyone. They’re going for a UI that you WILL use THEIR way, or else. And they WILL break any extensions you use within the next release or two. Which is an odd design philosophy for a desktop for an OS aimed at people who like to tweak.
danielton1@lemmy.worldto
linuxmemes@lemmy.world•spend hours ricing my desktop and decided I hated it at the end, and ended up wiping my entire OS
13·2 months agoI agree that KDE is better for newcomers. I’ll never understand why the newbie-friendly distros tend to favor GNOME.
The guy behind Nobara does a LOT of important work to make Linux usable at home, especially when it comes to gaming. And in case anyone doesn’t know, he is a software engineer at Red Hat, the company sponsoring Fedora, the distro that Nobara is based on.