data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20748/207488573fa4972d242941af9ea88078a1df5b27" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b04a8/b04a8d6db36231b3d34785df78698f18c37246eb" alt=""
3·
2 days agoThat’s what I thought. I don’t think their defense succeeding here really gets us anything new.
That’s what I thought. I don’t think their defense succeeding here really gets us anything new.
Has anyone in the US ever been busted for downloading from a direct download portal? Or usenet?
I think any progress here is mostly in principle, as I don’t think there’s a big practical risk to downloading only as it stands today, though I don’t follow things as closely as I used to and could be mistaken.
Joel Tenenbaum, of Providence, admitted in court that he downloaded and distributed 30 songs.
Your example is exactly why meta didn’t seed.
Definition # 4 is the applicable one here.
When multiple people politely point out that you’re wrong, perhaps digging in your heels and telling them to be better isn’t the right call.
It’s a solid defense, since the lawsuit’s about the sharing of the books. The metadata of the torrents isn’t part of the relevant IP, and how they used the content they downloaded is a separate issue.