It seems that the Linux Foundation has decided that both “systemd” and “segmentation fault” (lol?) are trademarked by them.

  • rhabarba@feddit.deOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why does the Linux Foundation even have a trademark process for “segmentation fault”? According to the poster on Mastodon, these words were the whole design.

    • roguetrick@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just like champagne only comes from the champagne region of France, true segmentation fault only comes from a linux program shitting itself.

      • bluGill@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Linux is the imposter here. Segmentation fault refers to how the PDP-(I forget) hardware organized memory. It comes from the original unix implementation which linux has never had any part of.

        • deur@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          x86 and x86_64 still have segment registers so it’s not exactly entirely archaic, but they’re not really relevant so that doesnt change what you said. I dont have the exact details on who implemented segmentation first, so I cant elaborate on that.