cross-posted from: https://gehirneimer.de/m/privacy@lemmy.ml/t/57607

The French government is considering a law that would require web browsers – like Mozilla’s Firefox – to block websites chosen by the government.

  • mister_monster@monero.town
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    What happened to telling governments to go fuck themselves? I remember when it was on the governments to police their citizens and if software violated their laws it was on the government to stop citizens accessing it. Why can they just not comply?

    • makeasnek@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I mean obviously we can do both right? We can both fight stupid laws so they never get passed in the first place and then refuse to comply with them if they do.

  • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    so in the download section of firefox website, there will be notice: “not recommended for use in france”

    problem solved 🤣

    • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      for-profit places will do that. i hardly expect mozilla to abandon the people of an entire country. though i’m sure they’ll make sure everyone knows what VPNs and Tor are if it comes to it.

      • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        i hardly expect mozilla to abandon the people of an entire country

        that’s not what i meant. i meant that the notice will be only thing that happens to formally comply with the law and everyone will be able to download the firefox “on their own responsibility”

        like when eu banned the classic lightbulbs, there was a discussion in my country because some idiots felt that “the dictatorship of eu is upon them again”

        now these lightbulbs are being sold with the notice “for industrial use only, unsuitable for use in personal homes”. every normal person buys led-bulbs and few thousand idiots are happy thinking how they showed them! 😆

        • Fabrik872@apollo.town
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Actally about those lightbulbs they are used if you are a machienist because most led lights tends to flicker which could cause stroboscope effect on fast moving parts and sometimes could present effect that something looks like is moving slower or in different direction that is really moving which could be dangerous. But there are also special machienist led bulbs but are more expensive than normal led bulbs. I am not a profesional machienist so sorry if i didnt describe it correctly but my point is that leds (if are not designed for machienist) are not safe in that particular usecase

  • CassowaryTom@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Honestly I am mildly curious about this, but I am feeling a little too drunk and lazy at this point in my day to look it up and the linked article was not helpful. Can someone eli5 what has the French government so salty? Thanks in advance, -Cas

    • TWeaK@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s about censorship and control of the internet. The French government is looking for another way to block things, beyond ISPs.

      • CassowaryTom@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        I forgot to say this at the time, but thanks for the response. You helped me to understand the issue.

  • Lobo6780@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Idk does France government knows that they can block addresses on ISP level but anyway, I’m not France government.

    • mihor@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      On ISP level? Only with DNS blocking. Which is pointless since you can simply change the DNS server to some non-ISP one. That’s probably why they want to force this stupidity onto browsers. Which is even more stupid and pointless.

        • mihor@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Single IP can host multiple websites. You really want to block half the internet?

      • Zatujit@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        If you are technical enough to change your DNS server, you are technical enough to circumvent that