That slide is kinda wild to me. It simultaneously dismisses one philisophical concept as unfounded (dualism) but then suggests the existence of some true human state which sounds equally bogus to me.
I’d be curious to hear what the heck they were trying to get across here.
What is the difference between believers and heretics? Well, the heretics believe that 2+2 equals 3. Meanwhile, we believers know that 2+2 obviously equals 5.
That slide is kinda wild to me. It simultaneously dismisses one philisophical concept as unfounded (dualism) but then suggests the existence of some true human state which sounds equally bogus to me.
I’d be curious to hear what the heck they were trying to get across here.
Religion B is False because it contradicts religion A which is stipulated to be True. To worship religion B is unhealthy.
What is the difference between believers and heretics? Well, the heretics believe that 2+2 equals 3. Meanwhile, we believers know that 2+2 obviously equals 5.
I’m guessing these are points to debate in class?
Wild if not