The Zenkit suite may do what you want. I started using it when M$ applied E3 to Wunderlist
The Zenkit suite may do what you want. I started using it when M$ applied E3 to Wunderlist
If only he had found religion instead of founding a for-profit, he’d be riding high and no one would care.
Seems to be still available on Apple’s store. And if Google intended to bury it, this is definitely Streisand Effect at work. Wish I’d known about this a few years ago when I was hiking more
What are anti-features?
Joplin has this functionality, although I don’t often use it since I prefer to type directly into the Markdown editor. Whatever you choose, be sure that you’re comfortable with the security and privacy implications of it.
This is a really cool idea, and some fediverse software already lets you follow hashtags (ie Pixelfed and maybe Mastodon). I could imagine this being immediately abused by mistagging to force material into your feed. It’s already a problem on Pixelfed.
Thanks for the explanation. I really do appreciate it. We seem to have a fundamental disagreement about whether this can be truly private and, indeed, whether it’s necessary at all. It still seems to me a non-private solution in search of a problem.
No, I don’t share location data with Google. What gave you that idea?
And your phone’s GPS wouldn’t work for all of those cases because…?
I disagree that location is necessary functionality.
I don’t really see the need for a location service in the first place. My phone can share my GPS coordinates with first responders in an emergency. For everything else, there’s simply typing in the location I want to know about.
Why is this needed? There’s a reason for Mozilla cancelling their service.
Is “not as bad as Google” really a good goal for a project?
Aren’t “privacy-friendly” and “location service” mutually exclusive?
Spectrum have the monopoly on internet service in my town. I won’t be engaging with them for anything else.
…you know what literally none of them do? Refer to their users as “he”
You’re either deliberately lying or haven’t bothered to actually look.
someone … would want to see it changed
So, by definition, “someone” has their own agenda.
SIngular they never fell out of usage, but it was considered non-standard English dialect for about three hundred years. Standard formal grammar rules from the 18th century until the last quarter of the 20th defaulted to he/him where gender was unknown or irrelevant. Singular they was grudgingly accepted as standard about ten years ago. Until then, every major style guide forbade singular they in favor of “he or she” or recasting the sentence to avoid pronouns altogether or to semantically justify plural they. Other languages have either found their own solutions or decided that their traditions are good enough and kept them.
Personally, I just avoid pronouns whenever possible, especially if someone is likely to throw a tantrum over an honest mistake due to a lifetime of custom. I’ve never been particularly upset at singular they, but I also don’t take offense if someone follows the older formal grammar rules either. <shrug>
Apparently, it isn’t about FOSS. It’s about trademark infringement.