Keeping in mind the DSM used the word retarded until DSM V came out in 2013.
Another history fact around the DSM is that homosexuality was a mental disability but that was removed way back in 1974 and society didn’t shift as quickly with it as it has now.
The issue with retard is that it is describing an actual medical condition and swapping the word isn’t going to change that.
Are you suggesting such an app can be purchased outside Google play but not used?
Having an app check a license server isn’t exactly new. Google play is simply a third party license server.
Commenter didn’t say work. It’s true in all circumstances.
You recognizing it as true in the work place by understanding women are expected to be like men in the work place. Because men are not expected to show emotions.
Your counter is actually an example.
Are you sure those home renovation workers weren’t trying to make conversation, might even being bragging about their own project attempts and you being a women had nothing to do with how they interact with any other customer?
Your comments here are an example of double standard.
You are asking for men issues to stay in groups specific to that issue. Anyone who did the same for questions about women would be called a misogynist.
What’s the test for Linux user’s fantasizes moral superiority?
If I end up on try that jury, not guilty.
You say you’re listening but all you’re hearing is how what is being said affects you.
You appear to see yourself as a victim. This makes you more dangerous than a bear.
The bear won’t take a women’s fear of it personally. It will want to avoid confrontation.
You will definitely take it personal. You appear willing to confront them for their fear. You will demand they not be afraid of you, because you are innocent. The scenario is one of a thousand reasons they choose the bear.
A tablet is not a luxury device.
The poster also does not say that poor people buy the high end tablets but rather that when they do buy devices they opt for insurance.
Rich people see a tablet as a disposable item that they can afford to replace.
Poor people see a tablet as an investment that must be protected.
I argue this isn’t an observation on one’s monetary wealth but rather their self worth.
The topic of the post isn’t about how to act rich but rather how the rich act in ways that differ from those without that status. Anyone can have a high self worth.
Claiming that people who are poor earn it by having lesser self worth is a way to blame the poor for being poor.
It is a dangerous line of reasoning that I felt worth pointing out.
I bet they have microwaves too!
Care to elaborate on what those services are?
He’s claiming to know others minds. That’s not experience.
What you’re describing has nothing to do with poor vs rich.
Your belief in social and economic mobility indicates this is your cooping mechanism.
You are finding a way to blame poor people for their inequality. That’s a much better example of the difference between poor and rich thinking.
Those old POTS phone lines did carry a few volts.
This, plus giving extraneous information that may lead to incorrect presumptions.
Piss in the sink. Wash hands. Problem solved!
No, I’m good. I’m not here to make friends. I’m not even expecting to challenge anyone’s techno-religion. At best I would say this is devil advocacy but it’s not quite that since it’s not about what I believe or do not believe. But it’s about what others believe and the display of fervent belief in others intrigue me, especially where it exists in the face of clear unambiguous reality.
For example, Trump supporters fascinate me in this same way. People say being nice is a better approach there as well, but i am not trying to deal with them or change their minds either. In that situation I refer to it as stick poking.
Again, it’s the belief that intrigues me. The sociology behind it is understudied.
This is copying a similar feature Apple added a while back.
Given androids hardware situation and love for collecting all the data l, I understand why people don’t want to give biometrics to their Android devices.
With the data and access our smartphones have, a numerical pin regardless of length, should not be an option anymore.
I am surprised that neither platform is allowing voice authentication as a biometric. I’m not sure if Google supports it but Siri can already tell who is speaking.