DarkThoughts

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

I’m sorry but I’ll never look kindly towards Islamists & Jihadists who murder, torture and rape innocent people. There’s absolutely no justification for this, never, and I’ll die on that hill. You can’t call out Israel’s genocide while praising the other side, which wants to do literally the same thing - they just lack the means to do so. Their overlords in Iran show you how their state would look like if they were in power. Hell, Sinwar murdered his own people too, yet he’s the fucking hero?
Calling Hamas the good guys is just tone deaf and straight up deluded, but once more, thanks for proving my point.

Well, there’s no way for me to disprove that I didn’t, unless @jerry@fedia.io has access to DMs of users and could confirm or deny my claim of not having any more DMs than that (and the two I send to respective admins since). That being said, the newest messages are at the top, so I would’ve had to do quite some editing to cut out any more recent messages.

Because it refutes the ban reason given in the modlog.

It shows that I didn’t even have any DMs, let alone practice “DM abuse”. My messages would obviously be quite a bit fuller than that if that’d be the case, and in relevance to the ban reason also more recent.

Oh yeah? I can even prove the statement of this deleted comment in this very thread we’re in: https://fedia.io/m/asklemmy@lemmy.world/t/1616032/How-are-mods-like-this-still-allowed-to-moderate-and/comment/8793062#entry-comment-8793062

Moderates? you mean centrists? Leftists shouldn’t be moderate. A moderate leftist is a neo liberal and a neo liberal is a right leaning centrist pretending to be a leftist.

Also hamas inst a terrorist group its a liberstion resistance group. Israel was literally born of terrorism and nothing resembling radical islamic terrorism existed till the 1960’s before then from 1899 till 1948 we had the irgun hagannah palmach and lehi waging a campaign of terror responsible for dozens of violent attacks and murfering between 6 and 8 thousand Palestinian jews, Christians and muslims as well as british military personnel and other international citizens caught in the crossfire. Zionists are the true terrorists in this conflict. If you dont agree youre not on the left you’re a right leaning centrist making excuses for a settler colonial state guilty of war crimes.

And that’s just one of probably hundreds of comments like these, or worse, that I’ve seen over the past months on here that justify murder & genocide. Many more directly calling for it themselves.

Do you even know the context of that comment of mine? It was about said mod removing a post about people glorifying Sinwar.

https://fedia.io/m/insanepeoplefacebook@lemmy.world/t/1324305/Reddit-On-the-death-of-The-Butcher-of-Khan-Younis

So again, tell me how it is deserved? I certainly did not equate leftists with terrorist simps.

Well, yes. I’m not gonna dox the people in my DMs without permission without a good reason to do so. If he can give me specifics about who I allegedly abused through DMs then I can lay that specific convo open.

https://fedia.io/m/asklemmy@lemmy.world/t/1616032/How-are-mods-like-this-still-allowed-to-moderate-and/comment/8793226#entry-comment-8793226

He accused me twice of calling leftist fascists (which is funny because that would include myself) by completely twisting my words about some very specific case of left leaning extremistic views, the second time temp banning me. Then later he turned the temp ban into a perma ban by accusing me of abusing people over DM, which is even greater bullshit. excluding the two DMs I tried to send out asking to stop the mod abuse, for clarification on that matter and why he’s having it out for me. No reply so far.

Thanks for proving my point.

db0 is part of them powertrippinbastards though.

I almost never seen any moderates being called a Tankie. Only when they end up making apologies for said examples, or more recently for various terrorist groups like hamas. Granted, I’m just left leaning and stay out of economic philosophies but I’ve clashed a lot in political topics with the definitely Tankie heavy user base on here.

Unfortunately db0 is one of them powertrippinbastards and a dirty dirty liar on top of that.

LateStageCapitalism was already a Tankie disinformation cesspool on Reddit. Not sure why it is on .world instead of .ml or lemmygrad though.

But generally, Lemmy mods are just users. So just like on Reddit, you’ll get all the flaws of this system with tons of mod abuse. If you have opinions that other’s don’t like, they’ll punish you for it and make up a bunch of bullshit to justify themselves.

That’s not much of a secret. The Blackbird, as well as the B-2 and F-117 for example were all tested there.

R34

This is a photo hosting site, that you don’t even need to stop using yourself. If you’d like to view motherless, you can. Hell, if you find something that’s not CP you could upload it on another site if you really wanted.

This is such a weird hill to die on. You’re defending a site known to have CP, that’s very weird.

I don’t really care about motherless. It’s just a simple principle regarding censorship and overreach and I don’t understand why you respond with such a kneejerk reaction? Bans like this should have a proper basis behind them, regardless of what site it is.

Your argument is reddit and 4chan hosted questionable material and they banned the site. Wouldn’t that mean, by your logic, that we would also want to ban it because if we’re supposed to be better than them, then we would want to ban something they deemed as worse than them.

My argument is that all those mentioned sites are known to have been a host for such material. Now the question is why we treat one site differently than others, despite evidently there not being much of a case against any of them at least in their current state. So yes, if all those mentioned sites host such material, and that is the basis for this ban, then all of those sites should be banned along with motherless. Also, I cannot really verify with what exact reasoning & evidence 4chan & Reddit banned it or who did it first. If they just said they host CSAM and gave an equally flimsy reason for that as you did, then there would be now just 3 sites that banned another site while citing each other? So what’s next? A fourth site doing the same, on the sole basis of the other 3 doing it but without further proof that there’s actually a CSAM issue there (at least one that’s not generally worse than all the other mentioned sites)? Do you not see how that is a problem?

Also, if there was a direct link to someone’s social media with personal identifying information that was not consensual it would get removed. So yes Facebook and places are not 100% in the clear either.

That wasn’t really the topic though? It was about alleged CSAM being hosted there, primarily based on your .pdf report, which also listed all those other sites along with it. Yet, only one of them gets this treatment? I simply do not understand how this line is drawn at this site specifically.