I wish retro gaming was niche enough for nintendoage and assemblergames to still be around…

Might just be me but I’m glad we are

https://338canada.com/

WTf you doing Canada?

It’s in every grocery stores in Quebec as a 3pack (4L total)

Lower your expectations, it’s still a Tim Horton muffin

That’s milk in a plastic bag tho

Maybe they cook only with an air fryer.

5.2 , slowly migrating all my homelab to quadlets.

To be fair, even in Linux it’s really hard to kill a zombie process. You have to tell the parent to own up to their kid, and then kill the parent.

People say this all the time, but it’s not really the case.

Except that it is, people with the skills already bridged that gap for everyone.

https://kbin.earth/m/fediverse@lemmy.world/t/267356/Lemmy-devs-are-considering-making-all-votes-public-have-your/favourites

Just so you’re aware

https://kbin.earth/m/fediverse@lemmy.world/t/267356/Lemmy-devs-are-considering-making-all-votes-public-have-your/favourites

No need for a Lemmy server, kbin/mbin put it in their interface

https://kbin.earth/m/fediverse@lemmy.world/t/267356/Lemmy-devs-are-considering-making-all-votes-public-have-your/favourites

Saying the fediverse is good for privacy is just plain false, that’s the kind of information anyone can acquire, even an ad company. All they have to do is federate a silent instance and see all you do.

It’s a plausible explanation but there doesn’t seem to be any historical evidence of them doing so.

It makes even less sense when you think about the fact that they would lose depth perception for the possible eventuality that that had to go below deck.

I consider open source software to be community owned/maintained so I never liked the idea of selling the software. It makes much more sense to my eyes to sell services surrounding the software be it support, customizations, or even hosted services.

I can’t really get over selling a “license” for a software that is expected to still be maintained by unpaid contributors. Especially under an AGPL license where any licensing changes has to be approved by every contributors.

If the attacker search for your password specifically then xkcd themself posted the reason why it wouldn’t really matter

https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/538:_Security

If you’re doing blind attemps on a large set of users you’ll aim for the least secured password first, dictionary words and known strings.

The part where this falls flat is that using dictionary words is one of the first step in finding unsecured password. Starting with a character by character brute force might land you on a secure password eventually, but going by dictionary and common string is sure to land you on an unsecured password fast.

More hugging time with the dog. 10 years go by fast.