![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/cce297d9-19e5-47b7-ada2-203d5780f961.jpeg)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/44bf11eb-4336-40eb-9778-e96fc5223124.png)
The funny thing is there’s a bunch of Portlands, but it’s always that particular one.
The funny thing is there’s a bunch of Portlands, but it’s always that particular one.
It’s about the context in which you wear it.
I think this cleared up our disconnect. I chose oblige to indicate that they require others to do something for them to occur. Most often paying taxes, to pay the provider of a service. This typically isn’t a ‘at gunpoint’ interaction. But negative rights will never require another to do something for it to be practiced.
I agree with your highlighting of the philosophy behind them. I was more concerned about a short rememberable way to differentiate the two.
So I chose oblige vs force to make sure it had the connotation of a civil concession.
Right tools for the right jobs. The issues arise when it’s out of place.
You just reminded me fiddleheads deserve a mention.
If people sold bricks only in the Spring they’d be seasonal. Seasonal ≠ in season, or at peak ripeness.
I agree that it’s a negative liberty. It’s just the from/to language can be misconstrued IMO, the not impede/oblige others framing is more clear without additional information. It’s, again IMO, targeting the core of the differential. Asking of others for inaction vs asking for action.
Funding for public defenders. They’re chronicly overworked and understaffed.
I recently found the American Revolution Podcast by Michael Troy which goes intro insane details about the war. 300+ ~25 minute episodes going into detail on every aspect leading up to and during the war, with a dash of dry humor.
That’s probably the more popular way, but I think it’s easier to misinterpret. For example the freedom of speech, one could think of it as the freedom to speak instead of the freedom from undue censorship. But that right is usually considered a negative one.
Tldr non partisan answer: Libertarian philosophy favors negative rights over positive rights.
Negative rights oblige others to not impede (like not censoring free speech).
Positive rights oblige others to provide something (like healthcare).
Here’s a few on reports:
-If you think it merits a report report it.
-If you’re unsure if it breaks a rule DM a mod.
-Idealy on a report write the rule # broken. If you’re typing past three sentences it’s may have unnecessary info.
-If someone is breaking a “don’t be mean” rule, the answer isn’t for you to break it too.
Here’s a few non report ways you can help:
-Set a positive tone.
-A lot of good posts/comments probably never get heard because people think it’s too lower effort or no one is interested.
-Crosspost to related communities to help people find related communities.
Flintstones chewables
I forget which one but one of the Supreme Court Justices has stated that they’ve estimated it could take as little as 2% of the national population to halt an amendment by starting from the smallest state and getting half plus 1 in opposition.
That would have been Antonin Scalia. He also advocated for lowering the bar to pass amendments.
That’s why they put so much in. It’s 1/3 hydrogen.
I feel like people haven’t been going to the moon as much as they used to.
Thinking new people are stupid for asking the same questions they asked 3 years ago. My hobby is every hobby.
IMO it’s simply a medium to convey ideas. There’s bound to be anime or manga worthy of distain. But you can say the same of film or books. Perhaps one might dislike the general trend of those industries too but I don’t think that makes it fair to judge future works based on the prior disliked works.
TLDR: Judge works, not mediums.
The Out Loud pre release from Cage the Elephant
Like others have said defensive wars. But I also don’t take issues with a countries that have a brief compulsory service system in times of peace as a means of ensuring a large pool of qualified fighters without a large standing army.