Funderpants

There are dozens of us.

They’re the same person.

Weird because I’m on boost and I get the block instance option when I press the three dots on any post in the post list (image 1). I’m also in 1.0.10

So this is weird, if you press these three dots on the post you will see block:

But if you use these three dots you will not:

Lol, I love that it has access corridors and utilities.

Reading the way this person speaks to everyone, they clearly are a stable, thoughtful person who should have guns.

Some for sure.

Hah, those were the days. On your topic though, yea it sucks the way celebrities are treated. It’s part of why they command such compensation (I think) they don’t get to live normal lives even if they wanted to. Becoming famous demands security to a degree most people aren’t familiar with at all.

When I was a kid we had a phone book, it doxxed everyone with a land line.

Awesome, thank you.

How can I get this job? I’m almost 40 and I haven’t been eaten by a mountain lion yet. 100% success. I’m qualified.

I’d like to read about that,understand how it’s done. it’s a thought I have whenever I see them but of course the professionals designing them would have thought about it.

Looks like a nice choke point for a predator to hang about.

Depends, am I female because magic is real or am I female because my gender fluidity kicked in over night and swung the needle?

Of course

Alright, sure. But that’s still just him being not just willing, but actively trying, to strip your human rights away for this magic economy and you rationalizing his actions as an acceptable compromise.

I would see that as a clear example of disrespect and disregard for my well being and the well being of people who I care about.

This isn’t about finding someone just like you to love, far from it, compromise is normal and differences between people in love are wonderful. What this is about, for me anyway, is that I would draw the line at someone who is actively supporting the deterioration of my human rights regardless of how many dishes they do.

I don’t think I would want to be with someone that went to the voting booth every few years and pulled the leavers to take my health rights away, because ultimately that’s what is happening. It would be a betrayal, it’s not benign and all the affable personality traits mentioned wouldn’t make me forget it.

For these rebuplican men, it’s saying “I respect you but regulation has gotten out of control, and your bodily autonomy is a price I’m willing to pay to fix it”.

The man shows no signs of sexism, of xenophobia or racism , or bigotry, but pulls the leavers for those things anyway.

You find his ideas crazy, note he has become propagandized, and is difficult to talk to about politics. I dare say if you pushed those conversations you’d be shocked at what you find.

Ultimately voting is an act, not speech or opinion, it’s an act to manifest your will and your priorities onto others through force of law.

So while one can take the approach of getting along to get along when it comes to regulation and corporate taxation, it becomes less easy when you recognize that, as a functional adult making an informed choice, your husband acted to end women’s bodily autonomy, erode women’s health care, end same sex marriage, deny and delay climate change action, and a whole host of other abhorrent policy goals.

I want to say, I take no pleasure at all in saying this to you. None. Your response to the post is just so personal it feels impossible to respond to in an impersonal manner. I just felt the need to challenge the idea that affable personality traits can make up for abhorrent policy goals.