Use a Chromium browser to inspect the cert.
If anyone knows how to get Firefox to show a bad cert before loading the page, I’d love to know.
Use a Chromium browser to inspect the cert.
If anyone knows how to get Firefox to show a bad cert before loading the page, I’d love to know.
Assuming you’re the one adding HSTS, you’ll have to inspect the cert and/or view the content that is getting returned. On desktop Chromium you can type “thisisunsafe” to load a page even with HSTS. Not sure how to do it on mobile FF.
Would seem weird for it to be intercepting your domain’s traffic but not the rest of the internet.
Edit: just noticed you’re not even loading an SSL page. Are you using https in the URL?
If you’re sure you’ve got a DNS entry for the Pihole FQDN pointing at Traefik, open the dev panel in your browser (F12), switch it to the Network tab, and visit the pihole URL.
See if you get anything back and especially take note of the HTTP status codes.
Can you see the router and service in the Traefik dashboard and do they show any errors there?
I think you’re close.
You need to change service: pihole-rtr
to service: pihole-svc
.
Do I have to redefine all of the same information I did in my Traefik yml but in this separate config.yml?
No, you just need to reference it like you have. Define once, reference many.
No worries for the question. It’s not terribly intuitive.
The configs live on the Traefik server. In my static traefik.yml config I have the following providers section, which adds the file
provider in addition to the docker
provider which you likely already have:
providers:
docker:
endpoint: "unix:///var/run/docker.sock"
exposedByDefault: false
file:
directory: /config
watch: true
And in the /config folder mapped into the Traefik container I have several files for services external to docker. You can combine them or keep them separate since the watch: true
setting tells it to read in all files (and it’s near instant when you create them, no need to restart Traefik).
Here is my homeassistant.yml in that folder (I have a separate VM running HASS outside of Docker/Traefik):
http:
routers:
homeassistant-rtr:
entryPoints:
- https
service: homeassistant-svc
rule: "Host(`home.example.com`)"
tls:
certResolver: examplecom-dns
services:
homeassistant-svc:
loadBalancer:
servers:
- url: "http://hass1.internal.local:8123"
Hope this helps!
I use the Traefik file provider for this.
https://doc.traefik.io/traefik/providers/file/
It picks up all my .yml configs in the watched folder which define the routers and services external to Docker.
I know plenty account SNI already, but thanks. You might want to study more yourself, since we’re being condescending.
So now your ISP sees all of your queries instead of CF. (Assuming the cloudflared option is using DoH)
I’ll trust Cloudflare over Comcast/AT&T/etc. any day of the week.
I believe you. I’m just saying their non-firewalls (i.e., switches and APs) don’t have that limitation.
My firewall is a Fortigate 60F.
I would never use their firewalls/gateways, but their switches are pretty good for the price and their APs are decent (although tbh after 3 generations my next AP will likely be an enterprise Aruba).
That said, I still use Unifi in docker, everything is up to date, and nothing is requiring a sign-in to the cloud. Am I missing something? If it’s just the firewalls, then I’m not surprised since I’ve never been remotely tempted to use them, but it sure isn’t all of their devices.
Lol okay. Where was I defending Samsung? This all started with OP stating “the point of a samsung flagship is access to the S-pen” and “this defeats the purpose of a foldable” as if it was universal truth. It is not.
But that how most people on Lemmy are, at least in the tech communities. They have no concept of nuance and are completely unable to see other points of view. They were wrong. You aren’t even making coherent points. I am happily moving on.
What is hard? Learning? Besides, you’re only proving our point. Samsung (and the market) have determined that the “one size” that people want is the one without an S-pen.
But go ahead and downvote based on your feelings rather than facts. None of you own a foldable anyway so it’s not like your opinions actually matter here.
Same here. Parent poster needs to learn that other people have different needs and experiences than themselves.
I have several docker servers, but for Immich I want a dedicated VM. Regardless the problem isn’t going to be setting it up, that should be easy. But for something as important as this, I am going to pore over every possible architectural design decision from the storage tier to the HA and DR strategy. I don’t want to start migrating to it then realize I wanted to do something differently and have to migrate again.
If it’s replacing Google Photos for my family, I expect the same level of resiliency and data protection standards. Or at least as close as I can reasonably get.
That’s been my plan to move off of Google photos. Decided on Immich a few months ago. Now if only I had some more of that free time to set it up.
In that case, if CF is taking to Traefik and not the actual origin server, you just need to forget about the origin certs altogether and use LE certs in Traefik.
I’ve been using Droid48 forever. It’s perfect.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.ab.x48
https://github.com/shagr4th/droid48