Except their split happened when it was revealed he was in contact with Epstein. And “differences” is vague enough that not many people care after. Keeping silent isn’t admitting “differences” with a spouse that you’ve been with for years.

So? Do you think a politician cares about their campaign promisses, or gets held to them? They very often do the exact opposite of what they promised actually

So no response to “this is impossible, four dudes would need to carry the entire chassis in through a residential door” other than insults. Gotcha.

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. And your story has a huge gaping hole in the middle of it that you cannot explain.

He’s Australian. The world doesn’t revolve around the US - most people actually don’t care about it.

Removed by mod

Who’ll vote on it though? It’ll just be vetoed.

Not how it works. Euro isn’t just a straight upgrade for many countries. See Croatia for a recent example - a lot of inflation and increased prices after adoption.

Poland doesn’t have the euro and can basically stall forever with no consequences. What are they going to do, throw em out? For having their own currency?

Gotta love it when people think words have some magical meaning that cannot change ever and hold everyone hostage

What approach? Because I bet you heard about “the approach” from a very particular ex blizzard employee with a large following that is against it. The approach is reasonable - release the server code so people can host their own when a company abandons them. It is 100% a reasonable ask.

You are arguing with me and you are looking to confirm your existing bias. You are asking me for ridiculous proof for what’s essentially someone saying “they are biased, here is one example” and you keep asking for more. As I said, I am not your monkey, don’t want to look for more, don’t want to put in the effort, then stay in your bubble of ignorance.

Jfc you aren’t talking to a search engine. Want to search, ask google. I directly provided info on their bias. The entire thing was controversial like a year ago here on lemmy. I’m not a monkey to be jumping through hoops to prove something to you. Don’t want to believe me even after I provided the example, don’t, I don’t care.

From their own description of Al Jazeera

Al Jazeera has been a valuable voice for the Palestinians as most Western media favors Israel. While most of its reporting has been factual in covering the conflict they have demonstrated one-sided reporting that tends to denigrate Israel.

Mixed for factual reporting. They cite 2 articles that they have found to be false since forever. They complain about “loaded language”. Yet they say “straight news has minimal bias”. Then they give Times of Israel “high credibility” and speak how unbiased their language is, giving the same examples as they gave in the Al Jazeera one for “biased language”.

High credibility is 2 “levels” higher than the middle of the field “mixed”.

I already gave you the examples, I said that they unfairly represent middle eastern news as untrustworthy. Or are you here to nitpick and “um ackthcshually”?

Ryobi for life

They’re incredibly pro-Israel and anti-anything else in the middle east. Reputable information gets a lower reliability rating from them “just because”.

Their problem is that any news agency in the middle east is automatically “untrustworthy” with quotes like “they haven’t been found to report false stories, but we still give them an untrustworthy rating”.

It is itself extremely biased, you believed an authority that isn’t neutral.

Probably that people have jobs, families and lives. Otherwise, why haven’t you already started a nonprofit that does that and donates to them?

No ads and no donations, they’ll put wishful thinking into the skillet and eat that I guess