Moon Knight: has mental issues and just fights well The Punisher: Has military training
Moon Knight: has mental issues and just fights well The Punisher: Has military training
It’s not, they’re not open sourcing their driver. They’ve made an open source driver.
Wow, that’s a nice tool. Thanks for the link
Building an open source project is not just a technical challenge. It’s a social one as well, and politics are a big factor in that.
I think you can set quotas, which could be 0. I have to say it’s been a while since I dove into the settings though.
https://ghost.org/ has fediverse integration iirc
Why does it make (commercial) sense for AMD/Intel to create so many models?
Because there is demand for various types of systems. And on top of that, if you make a chip with 8 cores and two are defective… just sell a 6 core chip instead of throwing it away.
What are their incentives?
Money
What would happen, if they would reduce the amount of different CPUs they offer? (Is there historical knowledge?)
They would lose customers to competitors in that space. When AMD didn’t make EPYC chips, all servers were Intel Xeon.
That would work if the only problem they wanted to solve was an outdated tech stack for X. But there are other problems that wayland addresses too, like: how to scale multiple monitors nicely, is it a good idea to give all other apps the keystrokes that you do in the one in focus (and probably a lot more)
Even paid it might be hard to find maintainers with knowledge of the code
As a Homebrew maintainer, what is there to red flag about a project providing tarballs of their source?
We would have to red flag pretty much every project that uses autoconf (since those usually provide a tarball where the user doesn’t have to run autoreconf
)
Homebrew rolled back the release after finding out
Couple of years since I switched and I rarely run into any issues with my all-AMD build
I’m guessing a lot of it seeing how tons of apps use open source components and libraries whenever possible.
Wouldn’t those two be directly at odds with each other? I would have a hard time describing anything without encryption as “privacy focused”.
If it’s open source you can generally configure it as insecurely as you want though.
Linux is a big part of it, but not all of Linux. Linux also isn’t part of the GNU project that the OP talks about.
Or did he?