But then why do some “banning from site” actions show up as done by mods in the modlog? Is it a visual issue and are those actually admins too?
But then why do some “banning from site” actions show up as done by mods in the modlog? Is it a visual issue and are those actually admins too?
Oh I was sure we were already on 0.19.x, didn’t notice the update got delayed, my bad.
Thanks for the answer!
If we defederate after the second step of EEE it still won’t save us from the third one.
However, if someone posts “Karl Marx is great” or “Communism makes sense” or “capitalism is bad”, you’ll probably see a defederation before the enter key is hit. (Hexbear).
Uhh… !aboringdystopia@lemmy.world is literally “CAPITALISM BAD” on a constant basis and it’s one of the most upvoted communities on the instance. And I don’t think Marx is the one people actually have an issue with, it’s more all the idolization of Stalin, Putin, Mao, Xi and the rest of the gang.
On Reddit it was actually a block that forbid people from seeing, or commenting on your stuff.
That led to people spreading fake news and blocking people who pointed them out, so that they couldn’t get reported on following ones.
It sucked. It’s much better like this.
From what I’ve seen it screams “we could’ve probably released a good game with another year of development, but who cares, it’s still gonna sell”.
Most Isekais are Novels. Barely any pressure in writing for most of those companies (or at least, not that type of pressure).
90s kids just need to come to terms with the fact that Pokemon is for children.
It’s not “for children”, it’s “all-ages”. Like Mario. And that doesn’t stop it from releasing almost consistently great games.
Its target audience is irrelevant to the matter, it’s simply that Gamefreak got lazy as fuck and just decided to go for the easy cash.
Well yeah, you might be right in that sense. I was focusing mainly on the “sexualization of minors” part, which is pretty much absent in Jojo, but if you factor “unhealthy relationships” I can definitely see the issue (you also forgot how arguably the most liked character in the entire series had an illegitimate son with a woman 42 years younger than him, that’s not really ok either lol)
…but the minor isn’t sexualized and the “unhealthy relationship” is portrayed as creepy. It’s the exact opposite of what the post is criticizing.
Plus it’s like one scene in one episode out of 190. Most people probably forgot about it after two episodes. Demonizing an entire series for less than 0.5% of it is kinda pointless.
Uh… you mean the orangutan in early Part 3? That’s like one episode and it’s clearly portrayed as creepy, while also not sexualizing the girl at all.
There’s like hundreds of good anime that fit the description (as other comments highlight), you’re just looking in the wrong places if you agree with this meme.
You’re obviously going to find sexualization of teenagers in most series aimed at teenagers.
Depends on the game. These ones for example don’t even require you to launch them through Steam.
Thanks for confirming what willya said, that was definitely informative.
Your first point is incorrect, though. It’s true regular users can’t see the exact names of who performed the actions, but I still see a distinction between “mod” and “admin”. In fact, most “Banning from Site” actions are performed by “admins”. That’s why some of them being labeled as “mod” instead confused me.