Ah, that makes sense. Thanks for linking!
Ah, that makes sense. Thanks for linking!
Also, this exact post, down to the word structure, shows up in these and similar communities every once in a while. I’m convinced this is a dark pattern marketing scheme - pretending to be a good faith user in these communities while secretly pushing this app as the prime directive.
This is probably the third or fourth time I’m seeing this post.
I’ve been looking at this for some time now and I’m still as confused as I was in the beginning.
Like Shia Labeouf from that song.
Actual Cannibal Richard Stallman!
I dont think that the stars comparison is very fair. One is a complex version control and product infrastructure system that intermediate users or experts in the domain get familiar with. The other is a coding tutorial series that literally everyone and their dog forks or saves when they start out on learning programming - every college student, every high schooler that has a CS 100, etc. etc.
Also, is there any point to being discovered by the legion of new users and learners on github? What about discovery by people that actually have the inclination and expertise, and have shown the willingness to commit to a smaller user-base because it’s FOSS?
Not trying to disprove or devalue your perspective, just trying to point out that the masses might be wrong to choose the popular option to help get “discovered”.
How do we break out of this path of trying to get big enough to break custom, and once you’re big enough not having the guts to test wide sweeping changes?
Bravo for the great summary and expanding on the article. I’d like to subscribe to everything you write.
Agree on the VScode comments. Some of the scummiest business maneuvering from Microsoft. The terrifying part is its slowly becoming so ingrained that its going to take a long time and a lot of directed effort to undo the damage.
Agree on the consultancy angle - this is woefully becoming more and more commonplace as true from-scratch engineering dies on the wayside. Do you think this can be mitigated by, say, college courses that concentrate on the base form of the programming domain? Maybe web development with backend hosted on a machine in the classroom, with a registered domain on an external registrar instead of the usual localhost bullshit, and students responsible for routing etc? Like an emulation of the old days when you started learning web dev on your home computer and stayed with it until you were pretty much a journeyman engineer?
Going after the wrong dude my friend, this guy is a friend of the FOSS movement.
As for you, its alright to keep all your project codebases on github or gitlab etc. I think the article is majorly talking about large scale codebases that aim to replace existing closed source functionalities. Either way, if you plan and wish to implement a large project that you think will have many contributors, perhaps you could consider codeberg and similar open source devops projects to host and run your new project on, from the start. That way you won’t have any migration pains. If it doesn’t end up working out, hey, thats also a useful report for others who might be thinking about doing the same.
I don’t think that’s the point that the article was trying to make.
Quantity becomes a problem only if its hard to find things you’re looking for. It’s not like you have to sift through hundreds of projects to find what you need, you just search for it and it pops up. I don’t think quantity is a big deal here.
Yep. It’s been getting slightly more unstable recently too.
Thanks. It seems like I’ll need to go back to handwriting notes.
Can you link me the study? I annotate like crazy, even on non academic stuff. I thought it would help remember some of this stuff.
Or atleast a keyword to search for would be good.
128 GB RAM? How much did the whole thing cost?
Is not getting updates such a big deal for MacOS?
Why do you think so?
I can’t tell if this is real and china is already calling dibs, or if you made it up right now.
Maybe a testament to the effects of the uber nationalistic, hyper-competitive nature of the chinese economy. Get nitpicky about the how of what you’re going to do and someone else will take the contract. Get too good at what you do and you risk government assimilation.
You mean for programming documentation?