Treczoks

Now that is the bonus we promised on hire.

It would be funny if the Democrats kept the GOP speaker on the job because he is so bad, and spells trouble for his own party…

If they actually were Christians, this would totally not be an issue. But they aren’t. They are trying to “look Christian” to get gullible voters. But most of them, if not all, are CINOs (Christians In Name Only), like Trump who had a road and church closed for a foto-op in that church where he held up a bible upside down…

I’m not talking about limits in low-level hardware support. I’m talking e.g. about games with anti-cheating software or productivity software with invasive license managers that are made not to run under anything but Windows.

There are actually only two kinds of windows apps that don’t run on Linux: Those made not to run on Linux on purpose, and those that were made by so bad programmers that you’ll be amazed how fast the “fixme” messages scroll in the terminal window from which you started wine. I’m working with one of the latter, and I’m happy that I just finished the last project with it. This piece of software is plain shit. And it looks like they don’t intend to fix their shit.

Yes, and yes, that’s what maintainence is for.

A good search engine would be quite important. One thing that annoyed me back on the site that should not be named was that their search engine was completely useless - It was not even capable to find posts where I entered verbatim text of.

Having a good search engine that can actually find a post I was looking for would be a major plus for the fediverse.

Spot on.

Maybe add a 5) needs to be able to export to LaTeX. It might be nice and easy to write in typst, but you’ll sooner or later hit the wall of “We accept submissions in Word and LaTeX only.”

The article just describes the how, but gives no reasons for a why.

So, why would anyone move away from the de-facto standard bash, except for some rare circumstances like having a small system and using busybox?

I worked with Unix before Windows was a thing. I’ve worked on windows, saw what a shitshot it was (and still is), and work with Linux instead. I do have Windows PCs at the lab for some renitent software, too, but it is always a step backwards when it comes to data procession.

There should be a community for both, but it should not be named “AskLemmy”.

Wouldn’t the charter not be more appropriate for a “DiscussOnLemmy” group? And leave “AskLemmy” for proper, answerable questions? That mistake was made on reddit before.

People don’t seem to get that this one is similar to AskReddit in purpose

Which does not make it anny better. Is there no better name for a group that is not about answering questions?

Well, it was way more interesting than the usual stuff here. So much about “thought provoking”.

Look at the charter. This group is not for asking real questions, as in “Does anyone know…” or “How do I…”, but for “though provoking” discussion starters. A bit like r/showerthoughts on reddit was. For that, a name like “asklemmy” is wasted.

Einfach passive Einkommem ordentlich besteuern und “Steuergestaltungsmöglichkeiten” streichen.

More like a disconnect between the moderators and reality.

Prerequisite: you == The asklemmy community

Well, you got what you asked for. As one is not allowed to ask real questions here, you get the “thought provoking questions” you wanted. No sympathy or pity from my side for wasting a good community name for a socio-psychological experiment.

Selbst die haben wahrscheinlich zu dem zitierten Text nichts zu bieten. Erfahrungsgemäß hält sich die Wissenschaftlichkeit bei den Sozialwissenschaften in Grenzen - Man muss bei irgendwelchen Studien immer genau hinschauen, wie sie ihre Fragen formuliert und aufgebaut haben. So richtige Neutralität kommt da selten bei heraus.

Was der Kollege mit dem Wikipedia-Link hier in der Diskussion gebraucht hat, hat ja auch nix mit dem zizierten Auszug zu tun.

Die Artikelliste ist zwar nett, aber da geht es um was ganz anderes. In der Richtung habe ich auch schon mal was gelesen, das ist mir aber eher durch (gewollt?) ungeschickte Fragestellungen aufgefallen. Das ist ja das Schöne in Sozialwissenschaften - es ist so schön einfach, ein Experiment zu basteln, dass eine Fragestellung bestätigt.

Aber zu dem von Dir zitierten Teil meiner Aussage sagt es nichts.