• 0 Posts
  • 132 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 2nd, 2023

help-circle



  • It is nice where possible and can help locally, but on scale it will not force through any changes. To see why, we only need to consider the historical material conditions that allowed the development of the current capitalist form in the first place. Small businesses where defeated by capitalists that could employ tactics the others couldn’t answer.

    In order to answer to the consequences of our current mode of production, we have to force changes to how production is carried out. Saying we want our products locally, ethically and environmentally made will only change their branding, not the fundamental exploitation in search of surplus value.


  • When you have to spend on things like haircuts, repairs, etc, keep the money in your social network.

    While I agree with the idea of not buying garbage, there is absolutely no way we can unconsume ourselves out of the capitalist ploy to extract surplus value. Do not put the blame on people who try to (often) satisfy legitimate needs, but on those forcing labor to be spent at the cost of both the environment and workers themselves.

    Ecofascism (not accusing you here) is not going to solve the climate crisis.



  • I am pretty certain our brains evolved to filter out friendly/known voices some tens of thousands of years (or more) ago. I feel tired sometimes before and after coffee, and often less so on coffee breaks because the real issue with coffee is that the caffeine can definitely disrupt sleep.

    I understand you need consistency to not be engaged by sounds. I hope you understand that other people have other limitations, hence, again, it is your first statement I disagree with.


  • I see you repeating the claim that it makes sleeping more difficult, but I do think those that listen to sounds, be it ocean waves or someone talking, have the experience that it makes it easier for them to fall asleep.

    Sure, there can be problems with sleep quality for numerous reasons. However, making a blanket statement that this disrupts the sleep, especially of those that have positve experience with it, is going to need some factual sources (that I do not think exists).

    According to what I have read, it is fine if it is not too stimulating.

    EDIT: Also, it is easy to take a break from coffee: It only requires not drinking a few cups. Either way it does not really prevent fatigue, at most delaying it.


  • How is it bad sleep hygiene to fall asleep to noise? If it is adequately non-engaging, it is pretty much the same as other white noise. Furthermore, it really depends on each person what makes them relax.

    To paraphrase an actual sleep scientist (and not just talk out of my ass like most people do about health):

    It is easy to see know if you are getting enough sleep. If you feel tired during the day, you need more sleep.




  • The (then) right-wing Norwegian government (left-wing by US standards ordered a study because they wanted to claim this. The results (source in Norwegian, use a translator) were the opposite of what they wanted.

    For example: “the businesses used more money on their workers when the stock owners were subjected to higher wealth tax” (paraphrasing here).

    Is a car or shirt or house personal property?

    Yes.

    I reference “dignity” because it’s part of “the unshakeable foundation of the Republic of Poland”

    Yea, not sure I care about the right-wingers in Poland either.

    cooperate with you if you remind them of the Soviet Union, and I expect that saying “we should remove the capitalist class” will do that.

    Well, I think we should be honest about our intentions, unlike the capitalist class that tell you “brown people” or “the economy” is the reason they pay you slave wages.

    What misinformation am I repeating? I wouldn’t have written a statement that I don’t think is true, so I suggest you point out anything you think is incorrect and explain your perspective, and maybe share a URL for some more interesting sources.

    The part about seizing personal property to pay taxes, for instance. A progressive tax system can have bottom tiers paying no taxes. The right are those who impose high tax rates on the middle class and poor, in order to make them hate taxes.



  • Urist@lemmy.mltoOpen Source@lemmy.mlForgejo is now copyleft, just like Git
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago
    1. Wealth tax does not block economic growth, rather the opposite, because it forces wealth to be reinvested to not lose too much value.
    2. You clearly need a lesson in proportional taxation if you think people would have their personal property appropriated.
    3. I do not give a fuck about you placing your dignity in ownership of material assets, that is a you problem.
    4. The top 10% pay less income taxes as a fraction of their income than the bottom 10%.
    5. Really, we should remove the capitalist class because they will fight back to the detriment of everyone else.
    6. I do not give a fuck about the IRS. I am not an American. My country actually has a wealth tax.
    7. You are repeating misinformation and capitalist propaganda with little understanding of what you are saying. Have you even reflected on what “the economy” really is? If you are a trickle-down Reaganomics-follower, you might want to get your brain checked.


  • Urist@lemmy.mltoOpen Source@lemmy.mlForgejo is now copyleft, just like Git
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    GitHub has long sought to discredit copyleft generally. Their various CEOs have often spoken loudly and negatively about copyleft, including their founder (and former CEO) devoting his OSCON keynote on attacking copyleft and the GPL. This trickled down from the top. We’ve personally observed various GitHub employees over the years arguing in many venues to convince projects to avoid copyleft; we’ve even seen a GitHub employee do this in a GitHub bug ticket directly.

    You only need to know that corporations do not like copyleft to know it is good. The same goes with capitalists and wealth tax / inheritance tax.




  • The EU requires government acquisitions to be publicly announced so that private companies can make offers that the government then must choose from (not freely, mind you, but following some “objective” metrics).

    Even though this might sound great to some, it has the downside of promoting commercial services and vendor lock-in up to the point that even if a free and open source alternative exists, it cannot be used unless there also exists some commercial entity behind it that can sell the software and support for it in accordance with the established metrics.

    This might be one of the biggest hurdles in the way for Linux adoption, since anyone can claim to do lots of great stuff with SUPERproprietarySOFTWARETM and then hold critical services, like healthcare mentioned elsewhere, hostage to their failure to deliver on promises and future bad support.