![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://beehaw.org/pictrs/image/1be75b15-2f18-429d-acf7-dcea8e512a4b.png)
There’s the horror of scientific software written by researchers I’ll share here. They are fired The contract expires every 2 years and users keep using the code if it’s successful. Some projects are closed source, even…
There’s the horror of scientific software written by researchers I’ll share here. They are fired The contract expires every 2 years and users keep using the code if it’s successful. Some projects are closed source, even…
I understand. I’ve been like you every now and then.
AFAIK after Getting Things Done appeared in the beginning of the email era, nobody found a definitive alternative for 20 years. And the GTD way of doing time constraints is “put it in the calendar”.
While each person has their own way of doing things, I’d be surprised if there were a revolutionary alternative to this.
I’ve tried a range of apps for recurring TODOs. Just use calendar events and fucking do it now was my conclusion.
That can’t be… reads articles this is really bad.
Yet, aren’t they restricting redistribution of non-GPL parts?
I just trying to understand RH’s argument here because so far it sounds like they are blatantly burning down GPL, and I don’t think even RH would do that.
Are you saying that RH doesn’t sell RHL to people who will redistribute the source code of RHL?
And are you saying that it is against the GPL?
Genuine question.
That’s like… both iPhone and Android are vender-locked.
Checks kbin and kbin app status. Sad, but the burnout part is true at least.