Bullshit DMCA abuse
Bullshit DMCA abuse
Have you passed their captive portal before turning on the VPN?
Every Lemmy instance can see which other fediverse instances they’re connected to, I’d be satisfied if it scoped to those instance domains. It’s going to be very rare to have a link to a Lemmy/kbin/whatever instance that is not already being followed by one local user, and when it does happen, the first time any local user follows it, it’s fixed again. That covers the 99% of cases better than having to educate every user every time in every thread they innocently post a normal url instead of knowing how to even copy this special url from.
Which, let’s face it, is dumb. Other clients should be able to recognize linked Lemmy instances and handle the click transparently.
Instead, now we have links that can’t be shared outside of Lemmy and links that should only be shared outside of Lemmy.
Yeah, they’re put there by a tomatow-truck.
(I know you said FOSS, but) I’d try Bing Image Creator for such a small job first. It’s free, and you can just tell it to generate a logo with the style you’re looking for.
If that doesn’t suit your needs, you can always fall down the rabbithole of selfhosting Stable Diffusion, but it’s probably more effort than it’s worth.
Look, I’m satiated, I don’t need to discover new apps nor great content through Google Play. Most apps are trash and I’ve never bought content through Google Play.
Wonder why they wouldn’t use OSM.
At least one per week, in various ways. Websites that no longer exist, obscure media I want to study… It’s great!
It’s alright. I use both their desktop backup service and B2 extensively. Their desktop client and web interface is very basic and a bit rough, you don’t buy their service for the well-developed UI. The service works as advertised though.
The headache comes up when multiple third party repositories start conflicting with each other
Which is traditionally why you needed the distro to package your software…
Depends on why you want to hide your server ip, what’s your use case? Is it to protect against DDOS?
Cloudflare is evil, but is there any other party you would trust to share everything with?
Don’t worry, it’s fine, there’s nothing inherently wrong with running stateful workload in a container.
You should really back that up with arguments as I don’t think a lot of people would agree with you.
I highly recommend reading the Github thread as this is not at all an accurate representation. These features you’re talking about are off by default. Removing them from the existing package is just breaking existing users. There’s already a report from a user who can’t access their passwords because yubikey support was suddenly removed. You don’t do that to users just because you suddenly develop an opinion as a package maintainer that you feel is important. There was no dialogue, no consideration and a very rude, dismissive attitude of Julian.
More tables though.
Of course it will, cloudflare is in front of it, they can definitely handje this traffic as long as itsfoss bothers to set correct caching headers for cloudflare to use. That’s the entire point of cloudflare…
Yes, but this way demand on instances scales with user count and aliows smaller instances to exist. Otherwise an errant toot on a small instance that suddenly gets popular will instantly drag that smaller instance down.
Either you misunderstand or the person you are responding to is. If you retroactively add a license to the current state of the code (for example by committing a new LICENSE file and adding the new license to the top of each file), or course that applies to the entire state of that code as of that commit. What is more difficult is that earlier commits won’t have that license explicitly unless you rewrite git history to make that happen (which is possible but tedious).
You can always relicense code you own the rights to. You can even dual license it, or continue to use it commercially in terms contradicting the license you open sourced it as, as long as you have the permission of every contributor.
The idea that a license added would only apply to code added after the license change is very funny.
No. People who want the benefit of self housing without worrying about hardware will rent a vps or something simpler. The hard part of hardware isn’t the purchase, it’s the maintenance.
Also, why the separate router?