KDE.

Mostly like Windows 7, but I recently moved the dock to the top.

My point is he’s not asking for it to be deleted from the entire internet.

You’re just here to jerk yourself off over “uhm, actually! nothing is ever deleted from the internet!” which also isn’t true.

Yeah, although in my mind it’s pretty much always been like this.

People on the internet are eager to say “something” even if it doesn’t actually address the issue at hand.

It’s sad, but it gets easier to deal with once we stop expecting more.

I don’t know what you’re talking about, but lemmy.world definitely does not condone what you’re saying.

OP does have a point.

This isn’t really helpful.

I’ve heard about that, but I haven’t tried it myself.

Thanks for mentioning it.

Wrong on both fronts!

I’ve been using Manjaro exclusively for at least 4 years and I have several AUR packages installed!

Admittedly, the installation for Arch Linux is not that difficult.

It’s the General Recommendations that become bullshit. It’s where using something else that sets all of that up for you makes sense.

Not sure about forks, but I agree with what you said before.

Manjaro is great.

deleted by creator

Not a big fan of the clipboard setup in KDE. It records what you copy after you’ve copied something else. This can be turned off by reducing the history count to 1, but then you lose your clipboard data if the application you copied it from closes.

Great explanation.

If I were the OBS devs, I’d make a clear indication on their website when reporting bugs that the fedora version of OBS is unsupported for, well, the reasons they don’t support it.

It seems way more effective than threatening legal repercussions.

thankfully arch isn’t getting into this nonsense

🙌

It’s important to acknowledge that nothing is completely secure.

I didn’t know this was an issue for OBS because I’m not experiencing any problems nor am I seeing anyone else.

Fedora’s opinion seems to be that upgrading is always the right choice, which we disagree with.

Ugh, I’m glad people are willing to fight back against these kinds of assertions.

Regardless of who is right, facilitating and encouraging this kind of discourse is how we end up with better software for everyone.

Lol. There you guys go making up bullshit again!

Taken straight from their website: “This is an experiment to see if we can create a VPN service that is easy enough for everyone to use and that people will donate enough to sustain.”

Can you show me where it says they don’t want people using it for torrenting? Or are you just making it up to fit in with all the other people who don’t want to admit they’re wasting money?

Uhh, no. I’m calling out censorship for what it is.

If the mods didn’t want their abuse of power to be criticized, they shouldn’t have abused it in the first place.

No. People just said it’s not designed for torrenting even though that’s not true.

From their website: “This is an experiment to see if we can create a VPN service that is easy enough for everyone to use and that people will donate enough to sustain.”

They make no mention of discouraging use by torrenters. That was completely made up by people on this forum who don’t want to admit they’re collectively wasting money.

If the VPN is free, then you are the product.

How about you actually think about what this means instead of regurgitating it as though it’s a law of the universe?

Practically speaking, how am I the product? Practically speaking, why does it matter? Practically speaking, you’re just regurgitating bullshit you’ve been conditioned to accept by other proud consumers to justify why you’re wasting money and avoid looking for better options.

I don’t expect more from any of you at this point.

It’s like they want for people to respond with their consumerist nonsense, then remove/lock the thread so I can’t say anything back!

Really scummy behavior, but I honestly don’t expect more. Something fishy is going on for sure!