I don’t think you understand. I know privacy extension is for outbound and not inbound, but what use is it on a server?
I don’t think you understand. I know privacy extension is for outbound and not inbound, but what use is it on a server?
I think there’s some misunderstanding
I get how IPv6 works, I got a /48 from my ISP. The problem is that I have some 15 devices here that I have to refer to in DNS and either I have to change their static IPs or I have to change their IPs in DNS if the prefix ever changes (it shouldn’t, because I pay for them to not do that). My laptop, phone and desktop do not get a static IPv6 and use the privacy extension. Is that not how you’re supposed to do it?
if your prefix ever changes you’ll have to update it everywhere
I mean that’s a good point but I’m paying money to not have my prefix changed. If I were to do it the intended way using DNS, how would I set up the DNS to be prefix agnostic? How would I reference devices in the firewall?
Very useful, but I don’t understand concept 1, “Don’t pick numbers”.
If I’m right, it’s basically saying don’t do stuff manually, just let the computer do it. I kind of disagree with this. All of my fixed devices have a fixed IP that I manually assigned and derived from the original v4 schema I also have. For example 192.168.x.y becomes prefix::y
Am I misunderstanding something?
I can’t afford a lawyer so I have no wishy washy ideals of taking a corporation to court for stealing my work ☺️
Most of my best pictures are also accidents. That’s just how it is with photography, man.
I’ve seen AC temperature controllers in this form factor. The outer ring can spin and will let you turn the temperature up or down. It is usually part of a larger smart-home system but it doesn’t have to be.
Not exactly. It was far more in the past.
Right here, facing south https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/55.86613/9.83164
This is the less edg version of my naming scheme; greek gods
If my ISP didn’t constantly break my network from their side, I’d have effectively no downtime and nearly zero maintenance. I don’t live on the bleeding edge and I don’t do anything particularly experimental and most of my containers are as minimal as possible
I built my own x86 router with OpnSense Proxmox hypervisor Cheapo WiFi AP Thinkcentre NAS (just 1 drive, debian with Samba) Containers: Tor relay, gonic, corrade, owot, apache, backups, dns, owncast
All of this just works if I leave it alone
why are people so upset about this?
I think the point is that root is a universal user found on all linux systems where as users have all kinds of names. It narrows down the variables to brute-force, so simply removing the ability to use it means they have to guess a username and a password.
You know Librewolf?
Just do that
I am leaving Tuta because they keep putting ads in my inbox and labelling them news.
Long Term Support… beta?
e: dis a joke yall autistic
Do you like dry reading? I do, and I started here http://intronetworks.cs.luc.edu/
It is not open source, so effectively no. It uses bridges which are open source and you can host them yourself and completely sidestep Beepers closed-source client.
They’ll make a bigger car to drive over it