Did the pigeon try the juice and keel over?
Did the pigeon try the juice and keel over?
It’ll be interesting to see how things change now that we’ll possibly get flooded with unregulated meat from Argentina et al.
You could just turn it off? Mine can make an animated rainbow, sure, but I can also just set it to mono-color for some backlight or altogether off.
Given that it cost me about 300RMB, the savings for no RGB were negligible.
I always say “I’m in” when remote connecting or remembering a stupid password or whatever but none of my coworkers get it because they’re not anglophones.
That’s a surprisingly kind view of things, but yeah, my dad did mountaineering his whole life and fucked his knees proper, but also likes to enjoy good food, so now in his seventies and with diabetes creeping in, it’s a perfect combo for becoming fat.
I guess it’s a bit easier to mock Steven Seagal because he’s been so fit in his movies throughout most of his career, and now it turns out he was an asshole all along, on top of looking like an asshat even when I loved his movies. But mocking him for being an older human still feels rather cheap.
Always a nice surprise when I see a picture and I think “aww, she’s adorable!” and realise where I am. Wonderful pick!
Would be interesting to see how they distinguish “personal consumption” and “transformative” consumption.
The AI did quite literally what any human educating themselves would have done : reading entire libraries to improve themselves. Then make money from it. So if little Timmy pirates 3DS Max or Photoshop to get a job, it’s fine yeah? Or a student trying to read their course without paying hundreds of dollars?
But wait, when Timmy reads a single virtual book, it’s thievery? It’s the loss of a sale? So how many sales were lost through all those virtual books stolen from paying customers by the AI?
They gotta decide one way or another at some point and stop taking the piss.
Also I wonder if the AI can actually remember the entire content of each book they read though. Or any. And if they do, then can that actually be proof, for each individual book thus regurgitated, that the copyright has been unfairly used since a full reproduction (or close enough as to fool a reader?) would be now available.
That’s gonna be some interesting jurisprudence.