• 1 Post
  • 32 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: November 17th, 2022

help-circle






  • pezhore@lemmy.mltoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldwhich git server for a company?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’ll come out with an anti-recommendation: Don’t do GitLab.

    They used to be quite good, but lately (as in the past two years or so) they’ve been putting things behind a licensing paywall.

    Now if your company wants to pay for GitLab, then maybe consider it? But I’d probably look at some of the other options people have mentioned in this thread.









  • I agree, but it’s a hard pill to swallow that Meta is the best partner to grow the fediverse. There are real lessons to learn from Embrace, Extend, Extinguish (look at XMPP and Google), not to mention privacy concerns and content moderation issues that seem to be a “feature” for Meta products vs bugs.

    I’m not sure what Zuck is up to, but for whatever it’s worth I think the best think the fediverse can do is be somewhat reactive to Meta’s movements.

    If instances start getting overwhelmed with content, then block.

    If Meta starts showing signs of EEE, then instances can block.

    And us users can move to instances that we feel match our personal stances on things - hate Facebook like the plague? Look at one of the defederated/blocking instances. Do you miss interacting with a larger audience? Stay on instances that are embracing (or withholding judgment) the Meta federation.

    It’s a complex topic to be sure, and the only way we’ll know the right way to deal with it is with the benefit of hindsight in a few years



  • pezhore@lemmy.mltoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldSelf Hosting Fail
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    I didn’t intend to use it on the chest freezer - it was mostly for the modem, but since I had spare battery capacity and outlets I thought what the heck.

    The power load is practically nothing until it cycles, and even then it’s fairly efficient - my current runtime is estimated to be about 18 hours, more than enough to come up with an alternative if we lose power in a storm.


  • pezhore@lemmy.mltoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldSelf Hosting Fail
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    8 months ago

    While I appreciate the sentiment, most traditional VMs do not like to have their power killed (especially non-journaling file systems).

    Even crash consistent applications can be impacted if the underlying host fs is affected by power loss.

    I do think that backup are a valid suggestion here, provided that the backup is an interrupted by a power surge or loss.


  • pezhore@lemmy.mltoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldSelf Hosting Fail
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    8 months ago

    I agree that 99.999% uptime is a pipedream for most home labs, but I personally think a UPS is worth it, if only to give yourself the option to gracefully shut down systems in the event of a power outage.

    Eventually, I’ll get a working script that checks the battery backup for mains power loss and handle the graceful shutdown for me, but right now that extra 10-15 minutes of battery backup is enough for a manual effort.


  • pezhore@lemmy.mltoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldSelf Hosting Fail
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is why I have about five of these bad boys: CyberPower CP1500PFCLCD.

    One is in my utility room for my cable modem and our chest freezer, three back up my homelab and wifi AP, and one is for my office.

    They’ve been bulletproof through storms, and when we’ve lost power, but not Internet I can’t keep on working.

    The big thing to look for is number of battery+surge outlets vs just surge outlets. Typically they top out at 1500VA - the more overhead for what you’re powering, the longer you can go without mains power.

    A screen/display is helpful for at-a-glance information like expected runtime, current output, etc.