• 0 Posts
  • 11 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 4th, 2023

help-circle


  • quat@lemmy.sdfeu.orgtoLinux@lemmy.ml*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    The things I’ve read (admittedly mostly from the OpenBSD camp) from BSD devs, they seem to not worry about corporations building from their source that much, instead they actively try to get rid of GPL code because it isn’t permissive enough for their standards.

    Theo wrote "GPL fans said the great problem we would face is that companies would take our BSD code, modify it, and not give back. Nope—the great problem we face is that people would wrap the GPL around our code, and lock us out in the same way that these supposed companies would lock us out. Just like the Linux community, we have many companies giving us code back, all the time.

    But once the code is GPL’d, we cannot get it back."




  • The original vi has not been maintained for many years. Most distributions, including Debian, Fedora, etc, use a version of Vim which (mostly) is similar to how Vi was.

    From Fedoras wiki:
    “On Fedora, Vim (specifically the vim-minimal package) is also used to provide /bin/vi. This vi command provides no syntax highlighting for opened files, by default, just like the original vi editor. The vim-minimal package comes pre-installed on Fedora.”

    From the vim-tiny package description on Debian:
    “This package contains a minimal version of Vim compiled with no GUI and a small subset of features. This package’s sole purpose is to provide the vi binary for base installations.”