They said “the official version”.
As the OP said, there are FOSS hosted forges. You don’t need to self-host.
With SourceHut, other people can submit patches by e-mail, no need to create an account.
If you “hire POCs” just to spite people who are opposed to diversity hiring, you are proving their point.
The two-tier reply system on SO is really useful and would be harder to implement – the replies to the questions, but also replies to the posts/replies. I don’t know how that would look if starting from Lemmy as a base.
How so? Lemmy allows unlimited nesting of replies, which is even better.
That’s why I said “probably”.
How long have you gone without being in a romantic relationship?
About 14 years (I’m 22).
If you’re currently single: is it by choice or circumstance?
Not by choice.
Do you / did you enjoy single life?
No.
What are / were the pros and cons?
Pros: More free time, less drama
Cons:
Is / was partnership a goal of yours?
Yes, obviously.
Those who are currently in a bus or airplane would probably die.
Since when are the Nordic countries communist?
Homosapiens survived hundreds of thousands of years as a result of collectivism and sharing resources
Voluntarily sharing resources.
Is anything in psychology reliably measurable?
This actually sounds like fun!
Not if the language is standardized from the start.
An alternative would be a language with a simpler syntax. Something like XML, but less verbose.
Have you read the CommonMark specification? It’s very complex for a language that’s supposed to be lightweight.
Markdown is terrible as a standard because every parser works differently and when you try to standardize it (CommonMark, etc.), you find out that there are a bajillion edge cases, leading to an extremely bloated specification.
Do you also urge your e-mail provider to block e-mails from Meta for all users?
Whereas wanting to kill people you don’t like has absolutely nothing in common with the Nazis.
Edit: The comment I’m replying to was completely changed, so now my reply makes no sense.
It’s “Homo sapiens”, not “homo sapien”.