• 0 Posts
  • 44 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 11th, 2023

help-circle







  • Yeah it had an almost sane reason initially - it was an investment bank, so it was designed to model the relationships between types of assets for simulations. But over the years they just got into the habit of using it for everything. It was somewhat like python, but with c-like syntax.

    The 2nd language was a haskell-style functional language (but without all the things that make Haskell cool) that was meant to be used for modelling and building internal APIs on all the data that was shared across departments. It was absolutely horrendous.






  • Do you think the concept of race doesn’t exist in Britain?!

    I’ll tell you it most definitely does, hell we practically invented systemic racism. Come to London and tell a black Brit that they aren’t black and we’ll see how that one goes down.

    Just because words that look like “Caucasian” mean the other thing in German and french doesn’t change it’s English meaning. Congratulations on your language knowledge, but are not the genius you think you are.

    I speak English, as an Englishman. Caucasian means white in British English.


  • But your sources have multiple flaws:

    • firstly, they’re all American, and so have no relevance to European English dialects
    • secondly, they did not say “Caucasian does not mean white European”, they say variations on “it is not the best term to use in academic literature”

    So my source - despite being a highly reputable entity whose entire reason to exist is to define words - is “incorrect”?

    “Could of” is different, because the social consensus is that it’s grammatically incorrect. Your argument is more like arguing that antisemitic refers to Arabs as well, just because Semitic includes Arabic peoples. Just because a term is derived from another doesn’t mean that it permanently must only be understood by its etymological roots.


  • What happened to “show me one dictionary”?

    Looks like your goalposts have grown legs.

    So, the common usage in both the country with the greatest number of English speakers AND the country the language originated in is incorrect? Because crispy_kilt says so?

    Language is a socially negotiated system, so what the word means to the people who use it is what the words mean.

    That paper is about what terminology should be used in academic work, who gives a fuck for people talking on lemmy?

    The scale of annoyingness:

    Pedants -> incorrect pedants -> incorrect pedants who insist they’re right, regardless of the evidence in front of them

    ----------------------------------------------------| you are here


  • I additionally linked to the specifically British edition of Collins as well for your benefit, which is, in fact, a dictionary. Seriously, trust me, if you go up to 5 Brits and ask them what Caucasian means, they will almost certainly all answer “white”.

    Wikipedia, also, is not a dictionary.

    It’s also pretty damn rude to classify the American usage as “incorrect”, you’re not the arbiter of what “real” English is.