EDIT: Let’s cool it with the downvotes, dudes. We’re not out to cut funding to your black hole detection chamber or revoke the degrees of chiropractors just because a couple of us don’t believe in it, okay? Chill out, participate with the prompt and continue with having a nice day. I’m sure almost everybody has something to add.

  • tiny_electron@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    It is just a logical statement. A theory must maximize data fitting and minimize assumption. You cannot beat a theory that fits all the data with only one assumption.

    Sadly we are not having a debate as I’m giving arguments and you are not willing to criticize them on a core level. I hope other people find this one sided conversation useful.

    • freeindv@monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m calling you on your fallacy that there is no belief whatsoever in believing in a scientific theory as the correct explanation for data.