• conciselyverbose@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    You provided a definition that doesn’t even loosely resemble the correct one.

    There’s no need to use words you don’t understand, especially when they’re wildly unrelated to whatever you’re saying. They just add confusion.

    • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      You say that like it’s that big a leap. In any case, sorry I wasn’t 100% linguistically perfect, even post-elaboration. Half of people say I should be concise, the other half says I should elaborate more, so I figured someone would sound unpleased.

      • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Because it’s a giant one.

        There is no valid interpretation of cryptography that resembles the way you defined it in any way.

          • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            That’s a terrible definition, but “codes” is doing the heavy lifting.

            It is not a code, in that definition, if it does not require knowledge of a key to decode.

            It is literally impossible for anything that doesn’t have a secret key to qualify as cryptography. That is the entire defining trait.

            • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              That’s a terrible definition

              How so?

              And what do you think I’ve been talking about this whole time if not forms of substitution?

              • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                The “key” is the mapping of cipher alphabet to message alphabet.

                There has to be a secret to be cryptography. The meaning has to be hidden without the secret information (though primitive/weak attempts can have a small enough search space to be brute forced). But the content being hidden without that information is the entirety of what the word means.