You can find all of these videos as written articles, plus some extra content, at https://thelibre.news You can the channel grow by donating to the following platforms: Paypal: https://paypal.me/ni...
  • HiroProtagonist@lemmy.caEnglish
    28·
    4 个月前

    Does this government funding really ever result in a hands off approach. In the case of Tor I wouldn’t be surprised that funding comes with backdoor access.

    • rbesfe@lemmy.ca
      12·
      4 个月前

      TOR fundamentally cannot be backdoored. The US government funds it because more traffic on the network helps mask the traffic coming from CIA agents and the like

        • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
          1·
          4 个月前

          No system can be proven to have no exploits, but a backdoor is when there is a hidden prepared exploit planted on the inside (in this case presumably because they were funded by the government they assume they would get this in return, even though if that was the case they would do a crypto transaction and not openly fund them)

      • HiroProtagonist@lemmy.caEnglish
        21·
        4 个月前

        The last reply I will make.

        From September 19 2024

        “In response, the Tor Project acknowledged that one user of an outdated application called Ricochet was likely deanonymized through a “guard discovery attack.” However, they emphasized that this vulnerability has since been patched in current versions of Tor software.”

        https://cybersecuritynews.com/tor-claims-network-safe/

        • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
          2·
          4 个月前

          Excuse me? Are you saying using guard discovery is a backdoor someone gave to the government? I mean, you can think whatever, but the technology isn’t really… backdoorable? It doesn’t make sense in the context. Where will the backdoor lead? It has no where to go.

          • JackbyDev@programming.devEnglish
            41·
            4 个月前

            (I am a different person, not arguing anything about this particular vulnerability or the government’s funding of Tor.)

            I think you’re defining backdoor too literally. I get your point, but colloquially it just means to get something nefarious in. If someone is saying “the government has a backdoor in an encryption algorithm” it would mean they believe the government has a vulnerability in that allows them to easily break the encryption, not necessarily a separate “door” or something.

            • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
              11·
              4 个月前

              Yeah the government has an institutional thing I forget what it is called, with massive amount of known exploits. That’s not backdoors. A backdoor is a “planted” exploit, not a discovered exploit. It makes no sense to call all exploits backdoors.

          • HiroProtagonist@lemmy.caEnglish
            17·
            4 个月前

            Okay buddy keep it going as long as you need to. You might enjoy Reddit more, it’s a safe space for people who cannot change their opinions. Bye.

            • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
              1·
              4 个月前

              Why? I am trying to understand what you mean so I can change my opinion. I’m not changing it because you are fuming and escalating the aggression, in fact, that has the exact opposite effect