Lots of people on Lemmy really dislike AI’s current implementations and use cases.

I’m trying to understand what people would want to be happening right now.

Destroy gen AI? Implement laws? Hoping all companies use it for altruistic purposes to help all of mankind?

Thanks for the discourse. Please keep it civil, but happy to be your punching bag.

  • Soleos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    This has very little to do with the criticism given by the first commenter.

    How do? What would your alternative assertion be on the topic?

    • nimpnin@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      think for themselves and create for themselves without leaning on a glorified Markov chain

      If you think your comment and this are the same thing, then I don’t know what to say.

      • Soleos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Well you didn’t respond to my questions and you’re vaguely referencing our other comments instead. It’s not effective communication and leads me to think you didn’t understand my comments. You seem to be into math, so I’ll put it this way,

        Be explicit, show your work: premises–>arguments–>conclusion

        • nimpnin@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          Well I first replied to that first comment. Then people started making completely different claims and the point got lost in the sauce.

          Edit: why should I take the time to formulate my thoughts well if you have demonstrated that you don’t give even the slightest hint of good faith to understand what I’m saying?

          • Soleos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Ah, I haven’t looked at others’ responses. I can see how responding to many different people gets messy.

            But to answer your question, because I took the time to formulate my thoughts for you, and I responded directly to things you said in your comments. I also asked you directly “How so? What’s your alternative assertion.” Which was a good faith attempt to better understand what you meant.